The need of accounting standards
for Islamic financial institutions:
evidence from AAOIFI
Adel Mohammed Sarea
College of Business and Finance, Ahlia University, Kingdom of Bahrain, and
Mustafa Mohd Hanefah
Faculty of Economics and Muamalat,
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Malaysia
At present, Islamic banks represent the majority of Islamic financial institutions (IFIs),
which are spread locally and internationally across both Muslim and non-Muslim
countries. The emergence of Islamic banking is due to the increasing demand from
Muslims communities worldwide for Shari’ah complied Islamic financial products,
services and the variety of modes of Islamic finance. However, Islamic banking is
evolving and growing at a rapid rate with an impressive record of more than 200 IFIs
operating in 63 Islamic and non-Islamic countries (Maali and Napier, 2010). The past
ten years saw high growth in the number of IFIs around the world that has attracted
major Western institutions such as Citibank, HSBC, and Deutsche Bank, which operate
Islamic windows within conventional banks (Maali and Napier, 2010). Furthermore,
given the rate of growth of the IFIs, the continuous sustainability of the development
by IFIs in both Islamic and non-Islamic countries needs Islamic accounting standards
otherwise called accounting and auditing organization for Islamic financial institutions.
(AAOIFI) accounting standards due to the unique characteristics coupled with the
growing demand of IFIs’ products and services so as to facilitate and enhance the
credibility and reliability of the financial statements and reports.
It is argued that the current standards which are based on conventional framework
seem insufficient to guide the IFIs.
Currently, the various IFIs apply different
accounting standards in their preparation of their accounts due to the absence of
Islamic accounting standards (Zaini, 2007). The trend towards the AAOIFI standards
has become a pressing issue that has generated heated debate among Organization of
Islamic Cooperation countries.
The needs for accounting standards and IFIs are emphasised in the Quran:
[...] Never get bored with recording it, however small or large, up to its maturity date, for this
is seen by Allah closer to justice, more supportive to testimony, and more resolving to doubt
[...] (al-Baqara: 282) (Tag El-Din, 2004).
In addition, “Those who eat Ribaˆ (usury) will not stand (on the Day of Resurrection)
except like the standing of a person beaten by Shaitaˆn (Satan) leading him to insanity.”
That is because they say: “Trading is only like Ribaˆ (usury)”, whereas Allaˆh has
permitted trading and forbidden Ribaˆ (al-Baqara: 275).
Based on the above quoted verses of the holy Quran, Allaˆh has permitted trading
and forbidden Ribaˆ (usury). For that, Allah sent his Prophet Mohammed (S.A.W) to
teach the Ummah and guide them. Over the years, Islam has gained tremendous
popularity and is currently recognized as the second largest and fastest growing
religion in the world. Islam does not only lead to ritualistic religion confined to
individuals rather, it also involves an integrated way of life that combines politics,
economics, culture, religion and every aspect of human life (Hameed, 2001). Based on
the fact that, Islam is a belief system that unites about 1.2 billion people around the
world which approximately constitutes one-quarter of the global population(Masood and Tahir, 2008), it is necessary that, Muslims develop and embrace a unique
economic system (Islamic Economic System) to meet their needs. In this regard, IFIs
have been established to fulfill this need by helping the Muslims community to avoid
Ribaˆ (usury) in their financial engagement and daily financial transactions. One of the
IFIs is Islamic banks. Islamic banks transactions as reflected in the financial reporting
are prepared under a variety of accounting standards which pose a threat to its unique
accounting and reporting system. Thus, Islamic accounting standards will ensure a
compatible accounting system. This, therefore, led to the growing aspiration for a
financial statement that has the potential to enhance the credibility of financial
statements that are in accordance with the Shari’ah, and the need to make the Islamic
accounting standards relevant.
However, before the implementation of the Islamic
accounting standards such as AAOIFI by IFIs, it is necessary to ascertain whether
AAOIFI accounting standards are appropriate and suitable for Islamic banks, and
whether the compliance with the AAOIFI accounting standards may disclose more
information to users in order to create confidence among investors and the public to
invest their money in these sectors.
Islamic banks operate mainly in developing countries-for example, the Middle East,
Africa, and South-East Asia. These countries are facing accounting problems in their
practice due to dissimilar accounting standards adopted to prepare financial reporting.
For instance, financial institutions in Jordan, the UAE and Qatar are officially required to
comply with the IASs. Meanwhile, in countries such as Saudi Arabia, the authorities
require compliance with both IAS and local accounting standards. In Malaysia, there are
national accounting standards (MASB) which are based on IAS (Ahmed, 2002). Beginning
January 2012, Malaysian accounting standards are in full congruence with the IFRSs.
Therefore, researchers in the area of financial reporting for IFIs have conducted a
considerable number of studies to investigate the Islamic banks’ compliance with
accounting standards. Until recently, one of the main problems facing Islamic banking
includes a lack of standardized accounting and auditing standards (Pomeranz, 1997).
However, conventional accounting is inappropriate for Muslim users and Islamic
organizations according to Hameed (2001), and it is inappropriate to impose unmodified
Western accounting practices on developing countries (Karim and Tomkins, 1987). In
addition, IASs based on such techniques would create difficulties for Muslims around
the world. Therefore, it is imperative for the Muslim accountants to develop accounting
standards which are specially adapted to Islamic needs, and for Muslim countries
(Shadia, 2007).
Basically, there is a lack of evidence regarding the adoption of the Islamic accounting
standards and analysis of Islamic banking principles under national Shari’ah advisory
council, central bank roles, political system and economic structure. Moreover, the
major problem is in the adoption of accounting standards and disclosure in IFIs that is still
based on the conventional accounting philosophy (Harahap, 2003). It is argued that
the adoption of accounting standards by Islamic banks will help to enhance their
credibility and fuel their growth worldwide (Ariss and Sarieddine, 2007). However, the
rapid development of IFIs requires standards for disclosing information, satisfying not
only the general standards of disclosure but also standards relating to Islamic values
(Harahap, 2003).
The actual practice and the level of implementation of the Islamic accounting
standards such as AAOIFI requirements among Islamic banks are currently unknownand needs to be investigated. Based on the fact that, these requirements are voluntary in
some countries, as well as due to the absence of authorities to implement Islamic
accounting standards, IFIs are currently applying different accounting standards in
their financial reporting. Thus, diversities exist in terms of their class structure, political
systems, legal systems, financial systems, educational systems, and the very nature of
conducting business and business ownership (Choi and Meek, 2005). Furthermore, the
problem may be due to lack of representative of the diverse environment factors as a
result of adopting or complying with different accounting standards by Islamic banks.
These differences among countries would dictate different accounting practices that
reflect the environmental factors of each country. A single harmonized standard of
accounting practices would be inappropriate and not representative of all the varied
environmental factors exhibited in global markets (Lovett, 2002). However, accounting
standards are used to generate comparable and reliable accounting information to help
investors, creditors and other users to make investment decisions. These standards
reflect the culture, history, and other characteristics of accounting problems facing those
countries (Abongwa, 2006).
Due to the current different regulatory requirements and legislations, the relevance
and comparability of financial statements are the foundations upon which accounting
standards are predicated. Lovett (2002) documented that, with financial statements
prepared under different accounting standards a problem may exist in:
. comparability of financial statements prepared globally; and
. reliability and creditability.
The Accounting Standards Steering Committee (ASSC) was a self-regulatory private
sector body, and ASSC became the Accounting Standards Committee in 1975 in the UK
(Whittington, 1989). Similarly, the AAOIFI Committee is a self-regulatory private body.
Both ASSC and AAOIFI brought in leading accountancy bodies to prepare and develop
accounting standards relating to recognition, measurements and disclosure. Furthermore,
ASSC and AAOIFI are professional bodies sponsored by charted institutions and are
non-profit corporate and independent organizations. The AAOIFI is supported by
institutional members (200 members from 45 countries) including central banks, IFIs, and
other participants from the international Islamic banking and finance industry, worldwide
(AAOIFI, 2010a, b). Similarly, ASSC is also an independent body sponsored by some
chartered institutions (the Irish and Scottish institutes) (Whittington, 1989).
By using the same approach of Solomons Reports 1989 to address this issue, the
AAOIFI’s current problem is lack of authority. Similarly, the main problem to impose
accounting standards in the UK is lack of authority as well as ASSC failure to avoid
controversy by accommodating the needs of pressure groups (Whittington, 1989). Similar
problem is being experienced by AAOIFI which does not have authority to impose Islamic
accounting standards globally. This is due to differences among member countries to
adopt AAOIFI standards in their respective countries.
However, regarding comparability, reliability, and creditability of financial
reporting globally or locally, Callao and La´inez (2007) pointed out that, local
comparability is negatively affected if both the IFRS and local accounting standards
are applied in the same country at the same time. In a related study, Mutter (1993)
stated that, it can be argued that the adoption of IASs would benefit many users of
accounting information, who demand comparable and reliable information.
in aditional Haverty (2006) found that, lack of comparability is mainly caused largely by the
revaluations of property, plant and equipment (IAS 16) permitted under IFRS, but not
permitted under US GAAP.
Global accounting standards are perceived by a segment of the financial community
as the solution to this problem, while other members of the community adhere to the
philosophy of maintaining individual, national accounting standards (Lovett, 2002).
In the adoption process of the accounting standards, influences that affect the rate of
adoption are identified. These influences cause changes in the attitudes of participants
in a social system towards the adoption of accounting standards. The influences
and their effect on the rate of adoption are what need to be studied in order to interpret
the association of the variables influencing the adoption of accounting standards
(Lovett, 2002).
Moreover, diversity in IFIs practices means that, there are practices that have not
been covered by Islamic accounting standards (AAOIFI) or any accounting standards
that are in line with Shari’ah principles. Therefore, developing unique accounting and
auditing standards for the dissemination of such information about IFIs becomes
a necessity (Tag El-Din, 2004). Islamic banks worldwide prepare their financial
statements using variety of accounting standards either IASs or local accounting
standards, the problem may exist in the practices and the level of understanding among
accountants and the level of compliance of Islamic banks global (KPMG and ACCA,
2010, Report). Thus, the need for Islamic accounting standards may possibly be the
right way to resolve these issues. In this regard, there have been arguments in previous
studies that, because of the unique transactions of Islamic banks, conventional
accounting rules such as the IFRSs are not compatible to Islamic banks (Maali and
Napier, 2010). This is because, in the IFIs, depositors’ funds are not guaranteed, and
customer deposits cannot be reported as liabilities in the balance sheets of Islamic banks.
Recently, however many Islamic banks have been adopting the accounting standards
set by AAOIFI (Maali and Napier, 2010). Therefore, understanding factors affecting the
levels of compliance with the Islamic accounting standards (AAOIFI) need to be
investigated in the future studies.
Furthermore, the acceptability and understanding of the role of the Islamic accounting
standards (AAOIFI) can be of high significance for policy implications, regulators,
and standard setters. Currently, the evolving literatures surrounding the interpretation of
the levels of compliance with the accounting standards for IFIs generated a heated debate
among the researchers. Thus, this paper aims to provide answers to the current debate.
A clear understanding and acceptability have the potential to lead to more compliance
with Islamic accounting standards such as AAOIFI. Therefore, it is uncertain to determine
whether the Islamic banks would switch to the AAOIFI standards or adopt a combination
of both of the AAOIFI and local standards.
It is therefore necessary to ask the
following question: do we need Islamic accounting standards?
Furthermore, the acceptability and understanding of the role of the Islamic accounting
standards (AAOIFI) can be of high significance for policy implications, regulators,
and standard setters. Currently, the evolving literatures surrounding the interpretation of
the levels of compliance with the accounting standards for IFIs generated a heated debate
among the researchers. Thus, this paper aims to provide answers to the current debate.
A clear understanding and acceptability have the potential to lead to more compliance
with Islamic accounting standards such as AAOIFI. Therefore, it is uncertain to determine
whether the Islamic banks would switch to the AAOIFI standards or adopt a combination
of both of the AAOIFI and local standards. It is therefore necessary to ask the
following question: do we need Islamic accounting standards?
AAOIFI had tended to start with objectives established in contemporary accounting
thought, test these objectives against Islamic Shari’ah, and accept those that are
consistent with Shari’ah and reject those objectives that are not consistent with
Shari’ah (Maurer, 2010).
The objectives of the AAOIFI organization is to prepare and develop accounting,
auditing, governance and ethical standards relating to the activities of IFIs.
According to AAOIFI (2008) the objective of financial accounting for Islamic banks
and IFIs are as follows:
. To determine the rights and obligations of all interested parties, including those
rights and obligations resulting from incomplete transactions and other events,
in accordance with the principles of Islamic Shari’ah and its concepts of fairness,
charity, and compliance with Islamic business values.
. To contribute to the safeguarding of the Islamic bank’s assets, its rights and the
rights of others in an adequate manner.
. To contribute to the enhancement of the managerial and productive capabilities
of the Islamic bank and encourage compliance with its established goals and
policies and, above all, compliance with Islamic Shari’ah in all transactions and
events.
. To provide, through financial reports, useful information to the users of these
reports, to enable them to make legitimate decisions in their dealings with
Islamic banks.
In reference to the above objectives, this research attempts to contribute to the current
framework and serve as a guide for IFIs regarding interest free transactions through
determining the levels of compliance with the AAOIFI accounting standards by
Islamic banks.
The adoption or compliance with the AAOIFI accounting standards and IFRS has
become the focus among IFIs. The objectives of the AAOIFI accounting standards are
to prepare and develop accounting, auditing, governance, ethical, and Shari’ah
standards relating to the activities of IFIs.
Based on the stakeholder theory, this paper discussed the importance of the AAOIFI
accounting standards for IFIs globally.
The AAOIFI accounting standards for IFIs that are in accordance with the Shari’ah
requirements are the best choice for increasing foreign investments and investor’s
confidence among Muslim societies and economies.
AAOIFI through its global network has also persuaded regulatory authorities to
adopt its standards, but until now AAOIFI has not been fully successful. It does not
have the power to enforce its standards on IFIs globally. It is strongly recommended
that Muslim countries should give full support to AAOIFI standards by adopting and
making them mandatory for all IFIs.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar